ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection have an increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. However, data on acute cardiovascular complications during delivery admissions remain limited. OBJECTIVE(S): To determine whether birthing individuals with COVID-19 have an increased risk of acute peripartum cardiovascular complications during their delivery admission. METHOD(S): This population-based retrospective cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample (2020) by utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify delivery admissions with a diagnosis of COVID-19. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to report an adjusted odds ratio for the association between COVID-19 and acute peripartum cardiovascular complications. RESULT(S): A total of 3,458,691 weighted delivery admissions were identified, of which 1.3% were among persons with COVID-19 (n=46,375). Persons with COVID-19 were younger (median 28 vs. 29 years, p<0.01) and had a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm births and Cesarean delivery (p<0.01). After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, insurance, and income, COVID-19 remained an independent predictor of peripartum cardiovascular complications including preeclampsia (aOR 1.33 [1.29-1.37]), peripartum cardiomyopathy (aOR 2.09 [1.54-2,84]), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (aOR 12.94 [8.85-18.90]), and cardiac arrhythmias (aOR 1.55 [1.45-1.67]) compared with no COVID-19. Likewise, the risk of in-hospital mortality, AKI, stroke, pulmonary edema, and VTE was higher with COVID-19. For resource utilization, cost of hospitalization ($5,374 vs. $4,837, p<0.01) was higher for deliveries among persons with COVID-19. CONCLUSION(S): Persons with COVID-19 had a higher risk of preeclampsia, peripartum cardiomyopathy, ACS, arrhythmias, in-hospital mortality, pulmonary edema, AKI, stroke, and VTE during delivery hospitalizations. This was associated with an increased cost of hospitalization. Keywords: COVID-19, Pregnancy, GDM, PCOS, Preeclampsia, CVD, Cardiovascular Disease Abbreviations: COVID-19: Coronavirus disease-2019, GDM: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, PCOS: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, National Inpatient Sample: NIS, AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HCUP: the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Funding and Conflicts of Interest Dr. Michos reports Advisory Board participation for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esperion, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There are conflicting data on COVID-19 outcomes in pregnant women. Using the AHA COVID-19 CVD Registry we evaluated COVID-19 outcomes in pregnant vs non-pregnant women with COVID-19. Method(s): Women 18-40 years old hospitalized from March 2020 to December 2021 with symptomatic COVID-19 were included (n=2,068), with 110 (5.3%) pregnant at admission. Women with unknown pregnancy status were excluded. Vaccine data were limited (2.8% of participants), therefore omitted from analysis. Baseline demographics and symptoms at presentation were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant women (Table). Rates of death, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, hospital stay >=5 days, myocardial infarction, stroke, DVT, PE, and a composite of all outcomes were determined. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed, adjusting for comorbidities and prior CVD. Result(s): Pregnant women hospitalized with COVID-19 had fewer comorbidities than non-pregnant women (Table). There were no deaths in the pregnant group and 44 (2.3%) in the non-pregnant group. Fewer pregnant women were hospitalized >=5 days (29.1% vs 41.2% non-pregnant);this difference was not statistically significant after multivariable adjustment [adjusted HR (95% CI), 0.67 (0.43-1.02)]. There were no significant differences between the groups in the composite outcome [adjusted HR (95% CI), 0.72 (0.48-1.07)] or its components (Table). Conclusion(s): Pregnant women hospitalized with symptomatic COVID-19 had fewer comorbidities compared with non-pregnant women. There were fewer deaths and lower rates of hospitalization >=5 days in pregnant vs non-pregnant women which was no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment. The potential for residual confounding due to healthier pregnant women presenting with milder COVID-19 illness or being admitted for non-COVID-19 indications compared to non-pregnant women must be considered when interpreting these findings.
ABSTRACT
Rationale The pulmonary vasculature is critical for gas exchange, impacts both pulmonary and cardiac function, and has renewed importance due to COVID-19. Pulmonary blood volume is, however, technically difficult to assess, generally requiring invasive methodology for quantification. Prior studies are limited in size and participant enrollment was selective;therefore, variation in the general population is largely unknown. We performed contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in a multicenter, community-based cohort to describe variation in pulmonary perfused blood volume (PBV) in the community. MethodsThe Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) recruited adults from six sites. The MESA Lung Study invited all MESA participants attending Exam 6 (2017-18), excluding those with kidney disease and contrast allergy, to undergo DECT at functional residual capacity via Siemens Flash or Force scanner: CareDose on, pitch 0.55, 0.25 sec exposure, 0.5mm slice thickness, iterative reconstruction (Admire) with Qr40 Kernel. Half concentration 370mg/ml Iopamidol was delivered at 4ml/s for the full scan, starting 17 seconds prior to scanning, including a ∼4 sec breath hold. PBV was calculated by material decomposition and normalized with iodine concentration in the pulmonary trunk. Generalized linear regression models included age, sex, race/ethnicity, height, weight, smoking status, site, and education.ResultsDECT scans were acquired for 714 participants, 36 of which were excluded due to image quality. Mean age of the remaining 678 participants was 71 years (range 63 - 79), 55% were male, 51% were ever smokers, and the race/ethnic distribution was 41% White, 29% Black, 17% Hispanic, and 13% Asian. Mean PBV was 468 + 151mL. The strongest demographic correlate was lower PBV with greater age (-30 mL per 10 years, 95% CI: -43, -18, p<0.001). Pulmonary PBV was positively associated with height, weight, and male sex (all P<0.001). PBV was lower in former compared to never smokers (p =0.04) and in Black than White participants (p=0.002), but not in Hispanic or Asian participants. There were no consistent differences across education or study site. Results were similar after adjustment for lung function and percent emphysema on CT.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first assessment of pulmonary PBV in a large, multiethnic, general community sample. Pulmonary PBV assessed by contrast-enhanced DECT was substantially reduced with advancing age and varied with body size, sex, former smoking, and, to a lesser extent, Black race. Understanding variation in pulmonary PBV in the general population may elucidate risk of cardiopulmonary disease and physical function.